The field and garden vegetables of America — A Closer Reading
Edition facts
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
Fearing Burr, Jr. opens his 1863 manual by distinguishing it from a general treatise on cultivation: it is meant to assist in selecting varieties, not to teach gardening methods. He notes that while information on propagation and culture is widely available, the specific characteristics that differentiate varieties—size, form, color, quality, season, hardiness, productiveness—have been scattered and fragmentary. To remedy this, he planted seeds imported from England and France alongside American vegetables of the same name, aiming to secure accuracy of names and synonyms. This empirical approach, grounded in direct comparison, shapes the book's descriptive style.
Precision in Diction and Detail
Burr's descriptions are methodical and concrete. For Common Cress, he notes the stem is smooth and branching, about fifteen inches high; leaves are variously divided, plain or curled; flowers are white, very small, produced in bunches; seeds are oblong, rounded, reddish-brown, with a pungent odor. He quantifies: about fourteen thousand seeds in an ounce, retaining germinative properties for five years. Such precise measurements recur throughout, reflecting a systematic cataloging mind. He also records differences in leaf texture—the Golden Cress has leaves of a much thinner texture than the Common—and in flavor, as when he notes the Broad-Leaved Cress is less desirable as a salad. These observations are not generic; they are tied to specific varieties and their uses.
Voice of the Cultivator
Burr's prose is direct and instructional, yet reveals his own judgments. He writes that Golden Cress deserves more general cultivation, as affording a pleasant addition to small salads. He warns that Curled Cress is very liable to degenerate by becoming gradually less curled, advising to select only the finest curled plants for seed. For Normandy Curled Cress, he notes it is difficult to procure the seed true, as Common Curled is generally substituted. These asides show a practitioner's concern for authenticity and quality. His dedication to Albert Fearing, praising his earnest labors and liberal contributions, hints at the social and agricultural networks that underpin the work.
Structure and Scope
The book is organized by vegetable type, with each entry following a consistent pattern: common name, scientific name, description of plant and seed, soil and cultivation, seed-raising, and use. This structure allows for quick reference. Burr includes both well-known and local varieties, acknowledging that many are comparatively local and never described. He does not claim completeness, noting that the list may not be perfect due to influence of soil, locality, and climate. The preface frames the work as a manual or guide, not a treatise, and the entries bear this out: they are concise, factual, and practical, aimed at the experienced cultivator as well as the beginner.
Observations on Use and Flavor
Burr frequently comments on culinary and practical uses. For Cress, he notes the leaves have a warm, pungent taste and are eaten as a salad, either separately or mixed with lettuce. He advises cutting before the plant flowers, as leaves then become acrid and unpalatable. He distinguishes between varieties for garnishing (Curled Cress) and for salad (Common or Plain-Leaved Cress, which he considers tender and delicate, equal if not superior to curled). For Golden Cress, he mentions its mild and delicate flavor and its dwarf habit, making it short when cut. These details connect botanical description to the table, grounding the work in everyday practice.
Burr's manual rewards readers who attend to its precise language and comparative method. The descriptions, built from direct observation and seed trials, offer a snapshot of mid-nineteenth-century American horticulture. For modern gardeners or historians, the book provides a baseline for understanding how vegetable varieties were named, evaluated, and distinguished before modern seed catalogs. Reading it with an eye for Burr's choices in diction and detail reveals the craft behind this practical reference.
Leo Nelson
3 weeks agoGrayson Taylor
2 weeks agoAva Gonzalez
3 weeks agoHarper Harris
1 week ago-
Donna Garcia - 3 weeks ago
While this book offers a wealth of historical information, it is hardly 'practical' for today's gardeners. The language is archaic, and many of the recommended practices are obsolete or overly labor-intensive. It reads more like a museum piece than a usable guide. If you're looking for modern, science-based advice, you'll be disappointed. It might interest historians, but for the average gardener, it's a difficult, outdated read. -
Brandon Douglas Daniels - 3 weeks ago
An indispensable resource for anyone passionate about vegetable gardening or farming. The depth of detail on the history, cultivation, and varieties of American vegetables is remarkable. Reading it feels like gaining a century of practical wisdom. The clear organization and the author's evident expertise make it both a pleasure to read and a practical reference. Highly recommended for gardeners, historians, and anyone who loves the land. -
Thomas Miller - 1 week ago
The book provides a substantial amount of historical and practical information about vegetables grown in America. It's interesting to see how many varieties have changed or disappeared. However, some of the cultural guidance is outdated and more applicable to large-scale farming, not the modern home garden. Still, as a historical document, it's quite valuable.
What was your reading experience?
Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.
Leo Moore
6 days ago