Principles and practice of agricultural analysis. Volume 3 (of 3), Agricultural products — Text and Context

(10 User reviews)   3212
In Category - Gardening
Wiley, Harvey Washington, 1844-1930 Project Gutenberg 2025 Not confirmed
Soils; Agricultural chemistry; Fertilizers; Farm produce Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 209,371
Reading time 911 min
Text sections 41

Before opening Principles and practice of agricultural analysis. Volume 3 (of 3), Agricultural products — Text and Context, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 209,371 words, 15 hr 11 min estimated reading time, and 41 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 14.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Soils,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Harvey W. Wiley's 1897 manual on agricultural product analysis emphasizes methodological pluralism, detailed laboratory techniques, and the chemist's judgment. Excerpts cover fat viscosity measurement, microscopic crystallization, and sampling procedures, revealing a deliberate authorial stance against prescribing single methods.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

uld contain not to exceed from 0.05 to one-tenth per cent of carbohydrates. If stronger, it should be diluted. Place one drop of the liquid in a test tube with two drops of fifteen per cent alcoholic solution of α-naphthol, add carefully one-half cubic centimeter of concentrated sulfuric acid, allowing it to flow under the mixture. The appearance of a violet ring over a greenish fringe indicates the presence of a carbohydrate. If the substance under examination contain more than a trace of nitrogenous matter, this must be removed before the tests above described are applied.

If the liquids be mixed by shaking when the violet ring is seen, a carmine tint with a trace of blue is produced. If this be examined with a spectroscope, a small absorption band will be found between D and E, and from F outward the whole spectrum will be observed. One drop of dextrose solution containing 0.05 per cent of sugar gives a distinct reaction by this process. It can be used, therefore, to detect the presence of as little as 0.028 milligram of grape sugar. This test has been found exceedingly delicate in this laboratory, and sufficiently satisfactory without the spectroscopic adjunct.

The furfurol reaction is useful in detecting the presence of minute traces of carbohydrates but is of little value in discriminating between the different classes of these bodies.

It is not practical here to go into greater detail in the description of qualitive reactions. The analyst, desiring further information, should consult the standard works on sugar chemistry.[143]

=175. Detection of Sugars by Bacterial Action.=—Many forms of bacteria manifest a selective action towards sugars and this property may in the future become the basis of a qualitive and even quantitive test for sugars and other carbohydrates. Our present knowledge of the subject is due almost exclusively to the researches of Smith, conducted at the Department of Agriculture.[144] Dextrose is the sugar first and most vigorously attacked by bacterial action, and by proper precautions the whole of the dextrose may be removed from mixtures with sucrose and lactose.

The development of other forms of micro-organisms which will have the faculty of attacking other and special forms of carbohydrates is to be looked for with confident assurance of success.

DETERMINATION OF STARCH.

=176. Constitution of Starch.=—The molecule of starch is without doubt formed by the condensation of a large number of hexose bodies. On account of its great insolubility its molecular weight has not been determined with any degree of accuracy. Its formula may be expressed either as (C₆H₁₀O₅)ₙ or (C₁₂H₂₀O₁₀)ₙ. It is insoluble in cold water and other common solvents and does not pass into solution in any reagent without undergoing a change of structure. In hot water it forms a paste and when heated under pressure with water it undergoes a partial change and becomes soluble. Heated with acids or subjected to the action of certain ferments it suffers hydrolysis and is transformed into dextrin, maltose and dextrose. In analytical work an attempt is usually made to transform the starch entirely into dextrose, the quantity of which is then determined by some of the processes already given. All starches possess the property of giving an intensely blue color with iodin and this reaction serves to detect the most minute quantity of the material.

Starch grains derived from different sources are distinguished by differences in size and appearance. In most cases a careful examination of the starch particles will reveal their origin.[145] The greatest part of the cereal grains is composed of starch, the percentage ranging from sixty to eighty. Rice has the greatest percentage of starch in its composition of any substance. Certain root crops are also rich in starch, such as the potato, artichoke and cassava. Starch appears as one of the first products of vegetable metabolism, according to some authorities, preceding the formation of sugars. By reason of its greater complexity, however, it is more probable that the production of simple sugars precedes the formation of the more complex molecule. Starch granules are probably used as a food by the plant in the building of more complex structures and the excess of this food is stored in the seeds and in tubers.

=177. Separation of Starch Particles.=—Advantage is taken of the insolubility of the starch particles to secure their separation from the other vegetable structures with which they are associated. The substances containing starch are reduced to a pulp as fine as possible, and this pulp being placed in a fine cloth the starch particles are washed through the cloth with water. The milky filtrate carrying the starch is collected in an appropriate holder and, after some time, the particles subside. They may then be collected and dried. While this process is the one used commercially in the manufacture of starch, it can only give approximate data respecting the actual quantity of starch in a given weight of the sample. It is not quite possible by this method to get all the starch separated from the rest of the vegetable matter, and particles of foreign substances, such as cellulose and albuminoid matters, may pass through the filter cloth and be found with the deposited granules. It follows from this that the quantitive determination of the starch in a given sample by any direct method is only approximately exact.

=178. Methods of Separation.=—Hot acids cannot be safely employed to dissolve starch from its natural concomitants because other carbohydrate bodies become soluble under similar conditions. In such cases the natural sugars which are present should be removed by cold water and the starch dissolved from the residue by a diastatic ferment. Instead of this the sugars may be determined in a separate portion of the pulped material and the starch, together with the sugars, determined, and the quantity of sugar found deducted from the final result.

In these cases the final determinations are made on the sugars, after inverting the sucrose, and proceeding as directed for invert sugars in paragraph =141=. The starch, after separation with diastase, is converted into dextrose by one of the methods to be given and the resulting dextrose determined by one of the approved methods.

=179. Separation with Diastase.=—Diastase or malt extract at a temperature of about 65° rapidly renders starch soluble. Cereals, potato meal and other starch-holding bodies are dried, first at a low temperature, and extracted with ether or petroleum to remove fat. The material is then rubbed up with water, boiled, cooled to 65°, and treated with malt extract (diastase) prepared as given below. One kilogram of ground green malt is mixed with one liter of glycerol and an equal quantity of water, and allowed to stand, with frequent shaking, for eight days. After that time the mixture is filtered, first through a small filter press and afterwards through paper. In case no filter press is at hand the mixture may be pressed in a bag and the liquor obtained, filtered. Malt extract obtained in this way will keep its diastatic properties for a long time. In its use, blank determinations must be made of the dextrose produced by treating equal portions of it with hydrochloric acid. For three grams of starchy material twenty-five cubic centimeters of the malt solution should be used and the mixture kept at 65° for two hours.[146]

=180. Method in Use at the Halle Station.=—The method of separating starch from cereals, potatoes and other starch-holding materials, employed at the Halle station, is essentially the same as already described.[147]

The malt extract used is prepared immediately beforehand, inasmuch as no preservative is added to it. It can be quickly prepared by digesting, for a short time at not above 50°, 100 grams of finely ground dried malt with one liter of water and separating the extract by filtration. This extract will keep only a few hours.

The material in which the starch is to be determined is dried and extracted with ether. From two to four grams of the extracted material, according to the amount of starch which it contains, are boiled for half an hour with 100 cubic centimeters of water, cooled to 65°, treated with ten cubic centimeters of malt extract and kept at the temperature named for half an hour. It is then again boiled for fifteen minutes, cooled to the temperature mentioned and again treated with malt extract as above. Two treatments with malt extract are usually sufficient to bring all the starch into solution. Finally it is again boiled and the volume completed to 250 cubic centimeters and thrown upon a filter. Two hundred cubic centimeters of the filtrate are converted into dextrose by boiling with hydrochloric acid, and the rest of the analysis is conducted in the usual manner. The dextrose value of the quantity of malt extract used must be determined upon a separate portion thereof, and the quantity of dextrose found deducted from the total amount obtained in the analysis.

=181. Separation by Hydrolysis with Water at High Temperatures.=—Instead of dissolving the starch with diastase, it may be brought into solution by heating with water under pressure. The former method employed of heating in sealed flasks has been entirely superceded by heating in an autoclave. The materials are best held in metal beakers furnished with a cover which prevents loss from boiling if the pressure should be removed too rapidly after the completion of the operation. The autoclave is a strong metal vessel capable of resisting the pressure of several atmospheres. It is furnished with a pressure gauge C and a safety valve D, as shown in the figure. The top is securely screwed on by means of a wrench, shown at the right hand side. In the figure a portion of the case is represented cut away to show the arrangement of the metal beakers inside.

In the method of Reinke, as practiced at the Halle station, and in this laboratory, about three grams of the starchy substance are placed in each of the metal beakers with twenty-five cubic centimeters of a one per cent lactic acid solution and thirty cubic centimeters of water. The contents of the beaker are thoroughly mixed and they are then heated for two and a half hours in the autoclave, at a pressure of three and a half atmospheres. The addition of the lactic acid is for the purpose of protecting any sugar which may be present from decomposition at the high pressure and temperature employed. After the completion of the heating, the autoclave is allowed to cool, the cover is removed and the beakers taken out and their contents washed with hot water into quarter liter flasks. After cooling, the volume is completed with cold water, and after standing for half an hour, with frequent shaking, the contents of the flasks are filtered and 200 cubic centimeters of the filtrate in each case converted into dextrose with hydrochloric acid in the usual way. In order to obtain agreeing results, it is highly necessary that the substance before treatment should be ground to a fine powder. The addition of the lactic acid, as practiced in the reinke method, tends to give somewhat high results, due probably to the hydrolytic action of the acid on the fiber present. When starchy bodies are heated in the autoclave for the determination of their starch by polarimetric methods, or for ordinary determinations, the use of lactic acid should be omitted.

_Example._—The following data indicate the methods of calculation to be followed in the determination of the percentage of starch in the material by diastatic hydrolysis: Three grams of a barley were inverted by diastase, as directed above, the volume of the solution made a quarter of a liter, filtered, 200 cubic centimeters of the filtrate converted into dextrose by hydrochloric acid, the volume completed to half a liter with water and fifty cubic centimeters thereof oxidized by the alkaline copper solution in the usual way. The amount of copper obtained was 331 milligrams, corresponding to 174 milligrams of dextrose. The amount of malt extract used in hydrolyzing the barley mentioned above, was ten cubic centimeters. The diastatic solution inverted with hydrochloric acid and treated as indicated above, yielded 191 milligrams of copper, corresponding to ninety-eight milligrams of dextrose in ten cubic centimeters of the malt extract. The quantity of malt extract represented in the final determination of copper, however, was only one and six-tenths cubic centimeters. We then have:

Total dextrose 174 milligrams Dextrose in one and six-tenths cubic centimeters malt extract 16 milligrams Dextrose corresponding to 240 milligrams of barley 158 milligrams

Calculated on the proportion that dextrose is to starch, as ten is to nine, this is equivalent to 142 milligrams of starch. The percentage of starch in the original substance, therefore, was equivalent to 142 multiplied by 100, divided by 240, _viz._, 59.17.

=182. Principles of the Methods of Determination.=—In the approximately pure state in which starch exists in the trade, it may be determined by conversion into dextrose and estimating the latter by one of the methods given. It is probable that there is no known method by which starch can be entirely converted into dextrose, and all the methods of hydrolysis, when used for quantitive purposes, must be standardized, not by the theoretical quantity of dextrose which a given weight of pure starch should yield, but by the actual quantity obtained. Starch is not largely converted into dextrose by any of the diastatic ferments which produce principally maltose and dextrins. Recourse must therefore be had to strong acids. In practice, hydrochloric is the one usually employed. By the action of a hot mineral acid, not only is starch converted into dextrose, but also the dextrose found is subjected to changes. In such cases an opposing action seems to be exerted by the hydrolytic agent, a part of the dextrose formed suffering a partial condensation, and thus assuming a state of higher molecular weight, approaching the constitution of the dextrins. Another part of the dextrose may also suffer oxidation and thus disappear entirely in respect of the further steps in starch analysis.

In such cases, the best the analyst can do is to conduct the hydrolysis in as nearly as possible constant conditions, and to assume that the percentage of dextrose present at a given time bears a constant ratio to the quantity of starch hydrolyzed. In reality almost all the starch appears finally as dextrose, and by proceeding on the assumption noted above a fairly satisfactory accounting may be made of the remainder.

Starch being insoluble, it cannot be determined directly by its rotatory power. When heated for a few hours in contact with water at a high pressure, starch becomes soluble, and in this state has a fairly constant gyrodynat, _viz._, [_a_]_{D} = 197°.

Starch is also rendered soluble by rubbing it in a mortar for about ten minutes with an excess of strong hydrochloric acid, and in this way a quick approximate idea may be obtained of the percentage present. Starch prepared in this manner, however, has a strong reducing power on metallic salts, showing that a part of it has already, even in so short a time, assumed the state of maltose or dextrose. The gyrodynat of pure anhydrous starch in such conditions varies from [_a_]_{D} = 197° to [_a_]_{D} = 194°. Starch is also rendered soluble by boiling with salicylic acid, whereby a solution is obtained having a gyrodynat of [_a_]_{D} = 200°(circa). The methods of procedure for the analysis of starch will be set forth in detail in the following paragraphs.

=183. Estimation of Water.=—In prepared or commercial starches the water may be determined by heating in a partial vacuum. The temperature at first should be low, not exceeding 60°. After drying for an hour at that heat the temperature may be gradually increased. The last traces of water come off from starch with difficulty, and the final temperature may be carried a little beyond 100° without danger of decomposition.

Ost recommends the use of an atmosphere of hydrogen or illuminating gas.[148] One and a half grams of the finely powdered sample are placed in the drying tube described in paragraph =23=, and heated in a stream of dry hydrogen. The temperature at first is kept at about 60° for several hours and is then gradually increased to 120°. Ost states that even at 150° the sample preserves its pure white color, but so high a temperature is not necessary. Maercker, at the Halle station, makes use of the same process, but employs illuminating gas instead of hydrogen. The importance of beginning the desiccation at a low temperature arises from the fact that at a higher temperature, before the greater part of the water is driven off, the starch will suffer a partial fusion and form a paste which is very difficult to dry. The dried sample must be kept in a stoppered vessel to prevent the absorption of hygroscopic moisture.

=184. Estimation of Ash.=—When the drying is accomplished in a flat platinum dish, the same sample may serve for incineration. Otherwise the incineration may be accomplished in another portion of the sample by following directions already given.[149]

=185. Nitrogen.=—Even very pure samples of starch may contain a little nitrogen which is most conveniently determined by moist combustion.[150]

As a rule, in commercial starches of good quality, the quantity of pure starch may be considered to be the remainder after subtracting the sum of the weights of water, ash and nitrogen multiplied by 6.25, from the original weight of the sample taken.

Per cent of moisture found 12.85 ” ” ” ash found 0.08 ” ” ” nitrogen × 6.25 0.27 ----- Sum 13.20 Per cent of pure starch in sample 86.80

Samples of starch usually contain also traces of fat and fiber, and these when present in weighable quantities, should be determined and proper deductions made.

=186. Hydrolysis with Acids.=—The acids commonly chosen for hydrolyzing starch are sulfuric and hydrochloric. The former has the advantage of being more easily removed from the finished product but the latter performs the work with less damage to the sugars formed. For commercial purposes sulfuric and for analytical practice hydrochloric acids are commonly employed.

The best process for analytical purposes is the one proposed by Sachsse.[151] In this method the starch is heated with the hydrolyzing mixture in the proportion of three grams to 200 cubic centimeters of water and twenty of hydrochloric acid of 1.125 specific gravity, containing five and six-tenths grams of the pure gas. The heating is continued for three hours on a steam-bath. Maercker recommends, instead of the above procedure, heating for two hours at gentle ebullition in an oil-bath. In this method three grams of the starch are reduced to paste with 200 cubic centimeters of water, and then boiled for two hours with fifteen cubic centimeters of hydrochloric acid of 1.125 specific gravity. The erlenmeyers in which the hydrolysis takes place are heated in an oil-bath and are provided with reflux condensers made of long glass tubes on which some bulbs have been blown, as shown in the accompanying figure. In all cases after hydrolysis the solution is neutralized, made to a standard volume and an aliquot part, after filtration, diluted to contain an amount of dextrose suited to the use of the table by Allihn for calculating the percentage of sugar. In diluting the solution preparatory to the estimation of dextrose, it is well to remember that nine parts of starch will furnish theoretically ten parts of dextrose. Since three grams of the sample are used, containing approximately eighty-five per cent of starch, the quantity of dextrose present is a little less than three grams. The solution should therefore contain not less than 300 cubic centimeters.

=187. Factor for Calculating Starch from the Dextrose Obtained.=—If all the starch could be converted into dextrose without loss, the quantity of it could be easily calculated theoretically on the supposition that the formula of starch is (C₆H₁₀O₅)ₙ. The factor by this assumption is, starch = dextrose × 0.90. If the starch have the formula assigned to it by Nägeli, _viz._, C₃₆H₆₂O₃₁ the formula becomes, starch = dextrose × 0.918.

Ost prefers to work by Sachsse’s method and to use the factor 0.925 to convert the dextrose into starch.[152]

In view of all the facts in the case it appears that the analyst will reach nearly correct results by converting the starch into dextrose by heating for three hours at 100° with hydrochloric acid or for two hours at gentle ebullition as directed above, determining the resultant dextrose and multiplying the weight thereof by 0.92.

Harvey W. Wiley opens the third volume of Principles and Practice of Agricultural Analysis with a deliberate refusal to designate any single method as proper. In the preface, he writes that to do so “would be a radical departure from the fundamental idea of the work; viz., to rely on the good judgment and experience of the chemist.” This authorial choice—to present multiple techniques without ranking them—shapes every subsequent section. The book is a compendium of options, not a prescription.

The excerpts show Wiley’s commitment to detailed procedural description. In the section on fat analysis, he explains Doolittle’s viscosity method step by step: twisting the wire 360°, reading the index at the end of the first swing, and calculating retardation. He also includes a warning that microscopic examination of fat crystals “must be regarded only as helpful and confirmatory,” acknowledging that results can be “negative or misleading.” This cautious, evidence-based tone pervades the work.

A Philosophy of Method Selection

Wiley’s preface makes explicit his pedagogical stance. He states that the book aims “to present to the busy worker a broad view of a great subject,” and he trusts the analyst’s judgment over his own. This is not a textbook that dictates procedure; it is a reference that surveys the field. The author notes that a future volume of “selected methods” might be prepared for students, but that possibility “has not been allowed to change the purpose of the author.” The deliberate avoidance of bias is a recurring structural principle.

In the table of contents, the first part covers “Sampling, Drying, Incineration and Extractions,” indicating a logical progression from obtaining a sample to preparing it for analysis. Yet within each topic, multiple approaches are described. For example, the sampling section includes methods for vegetable and animal substances, preserving samples, and grinding—each with its own considerations. Wiley does not rank them; he presents them as tools for the chemist to choose from based on the specific material and question at hand.

Precision in Viscosity Measurement

The excerpt on Doolittle’s method for measuring oil viscosity reveals Wiley’s attention to experimental detail. The procedure involves a rotating pendulum in oil; the retardation between the first and second complete arcs is read directly. To eliminate errors, duplicate determinations are made with the milled head rotated in opposite directions. The mean of the two readings gives the “true retardation.” Each instrument is standardized using a solution of pure cane sugar, as proposed by Babcock, and the viscosity is expressed as the number of grams of sugar per 100 cubic centimeters that would produce the same retardation at 22°.

Wiley includes a table of results from Krug: peanut oil 48.50, olive oil 53.00, cottonseed oil 46.25, linseed oil 33.50. These numbers are presented without interpretation, leaving the analyst to draw conclusions. The method is described with enough precision to be replicated, yet the author does not claim it is the only or best way—consistent with his overall approach.

Microscopic Crystallization as a Confirmatory Tool

In the section on microscopic appearance of fats, Wiley describes a method for obtaining crystals from ethereal solution. Two to five grams of fat are dissolved in ether, left loosely stoppered for fifteen hours or longer, and then a drop is placed on a slide with cotton or olive oil. He advises preparing several solutions with varying solvent properties, because “it is not possible to secure in a given instance those conditions which produce the most characteristic crystals.” The analyst must be patient and flexible.

Wiley explicitly warns that results “are very definite” in some cases, but “the analyst must be warned not to expect definite data in all cases.” He calls the method “only helpful and confirmatory.” This caution is typical of the book: techniques are offered with their limitations clearly stated. A modification by Gladding is also described, using a mixture of absolute alcohol and ether, and allowing crystallization in a cool place for half an hour. Again, no single protocol is elevated.

The Chemist’s Judgment as Final Authority

Throughout the excerpts, Wiley returns to the theme of the analyst’s expertise. The preface states that “a biased judgment is little better than none at all,” and the book is designed to equip the chemist with a range of methods rather than a single answer. This is reflected in the structure: each technique is presented with its own rationale, procedure, and caveats, but the final decision is left to the reader.

In the viscosity section, the method includes a table of corrections and a formula for calculating viscosity from retardation, but the interpretation of the resulting number—whether 48.50 for peanut oil is high or low—is not given. Similarly, the microscopic method concludes with a note that “often the microscopic investigations result in the production of negative or misleading observations.” Wiley trusts the chemist to weigh the evidence. This authorial restraint is the book’s defining characteristic.

Wiley’s volume is best approached as a laboratory companion rather than a textbook. Readers should expect to encounter multiple procedures for the same analysis, each described with enough detail to perform, but without a verdict on which is superior. The author’s voice is that of an experienced colleague presenting the state of the art circa 1897, not a lecturer prescribing a single path. For modern readers, the book offers a window into the development of agricultural chemistry and the analytical challenges of the late nineteenth century.

Reading Wiley's insistence on the chemist's own judgment, I remembered my father testing soil pH with kitchen vinegar, trusting his hands over any manual. It felt like the patience in Wood and garden — Text and Context, where growing things asks for quiet attention rather than rigid rules. Both books whisper that method matters less than the thoughtful observer.

Anthony Perez
3 weeks ago

Ava Perez
2 weeks ago

Mila Walker
3 weeks ago

Matthew Martinez
1 month ago

Oliver Allen
1 week ago

4.5
4.5 out of 5 (10 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

What did you think of this book?

Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

How much did you enjoy the reading experience?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

What was the reading difficulty like?

Related eBooks