Computers on the Farm Farm Uses for Computers, How to Select Software and Hardware, and Online Information Sources in Agriculture — Text and Context

A Farmer’s-Eye View of Computer Uses

The bulletin opens with a list of practical applications that reveal the author’s understanding of farm operations. It mentions determining "the most economical feed ration for dairy cows," scheduling irrigation, and keeping "livestock breeding and production records." These are not generic office tasks; they are specific to agricultural cycles and decision-making. The author also includes tax records and cash-flow tracking, acknowledging that farm finances are intertwined with household and business accounting. The list is ordered by apparent frequency of use, with recordkeeping first. Notably, the bulletin does not claim computers will revolutionize farming; instead, it presents them as tools for existing tasks. The phrase "get quick access to records" emphasizes efficiency over transformation. This section establishes that the author’s primary audience is the working farmer, not a tech enthusiast.

Checklists as Decision Tools

The bulletin includes two detailed checklists: one for evaluating software and one for hardware. Each checklist is a series of questions, such as "Is the software easy to use?" and "Does the hardware have enough memory?" The author avoids recommending specific brands, instead teaching a method of evaluation. The software checklist emphasizes compatibility and support: "Can you get help if you have problems?" The hardware checklist asks about expandability and service. These lists reflect the author’s awareness that farmers might be wary of rapid technological change. By providing criteria rather than answers, the bulletin empowers the reader to make informed choices. The checklists also serve as a subtle argument: buying a computer is a deliberate investment, not a fad. The author’s tone is neutral but insistent on due diligence, a stance that aligns with the USDA’s role as an objective advisor.

The Landscape of Online Agricultural Data in 1984

A substantial portion of the bulletin catalogs online information sources, many of which are now obscure. The author lists services like CompuServe, Chase Econometrics, and the Computerized Management Network (CMN). Each entry includes an address and a description of the data offered. For example, CMN is described as "designed to be used by people who have no special training with computers." The author highlights USDA sources such as the Statistical Reporting Service and the Economic Research Service. The inclusion of addresses suggests that farmers would contact these services by mail or phone. The bulletin treats online access as a novel but practical resource, not a futuristic dream. The language is factual and administrative, listing what each service provides without hype. This section reveals the early infrastructure of agricultural informatics, where government, university, and private systems coexisted.

Glossary as a Bridge Between Worlds

The bulletin ends with a glossary of computer terms, defined in plain language. Terms like "hardware," "software," and "online" are explained without condescension. The glossary is not merely a reference; it is a pedagogical tool. By placing it at the end, the author allows readers to consult it as needed without interrupting the main text. The definitions are short and functional: "Hardware—the physical equipment itself." This simplicity reflects the author’s assumption that the reader is intelligent but not technically trained. The glossary also serves as a subtle reassurance: the jargon of computing can be learned. The bulletin’s overall structure—from uses to selection to sources to definitions—creates a complete learning arc. The author’s voice remains consistent: patient, precise, and focused on the farmer’s practical needs.

This bulletin is best read as a historical artifact of agricultural extension in the mid-1980s. Its value lies not in technical accuracy—many services and systems are obsolete—but in its depiction of how computers were introduced to a skeptical, task-oriented audience. The author’s choices in diction, structure, and content reveal a deliberate effort to demystify technology without overselling it. Readers interested in the rhetoric of technology adoption or the history of farm computing will find this a rich primary source.